My front-page appearance in The Wall Street Journal is ushering in the end times.

Some of you may be aware of my recent publicity coup. If not, you need to adjust your radar. My moving and shaking should be noted in everyone's buzzworthy list.

Here it is, ladies and gentlemen, the front page of The Wall Street Journal from Friday the 15th, December 2006:


That's right. Your favorite toy soldier has managed to catapult, in a remarkably short amount of time, to the very front of America's most trusted business daily. I'm included in the above-headline teaser, sandwiched between a piece about NASD CEO Mary Schapiro and a feature on the new "jetrosexual" trend (i.e., cheap custom-tailoring from Asia). Needless to say I'm the biggest draw. Mary Schapirwho? And jetrosexual? No one reads about fashion from the WSJ. The millions of sleepy commuters, mid-level managers, and alcoholic business executives come to its off-white pages to steal a glimpse of a handsome young man outfitted in the brilliant red, black, and gold of the FAO toy soldier. Did anyone need their $17 cup of coffee to wake-up that glorious morning?

In addition, an even larger picture ran alongside the story in the Marketplace section:


Oh my. The whole situation is more than slightly ridiculous. I am after all in a toy soldier outfit, lest you forget. My debut into the stratosphere of national print media required me looking like the silliest little soul in five boroughs. (Strike that. Yesterday I passed a woman dressed as a toilet dancing outside of Charmin's public restrooms in Time Square. I'd sure like to read her blog.) And yet I appear so completely overjoyed to be working at FAO and having my picture taken. Clearly there is no place I'd rather be and nothing else I'd rather be wearing. But I couldn't even get a name credit in the caption, even though the photographer wrote it down on his ruled pad of paper along with how long I had been working at the store (2 months) and what my position was actually called (toy soldier).

Read it again, and you'll discover just who is named: Ed Schumlts, FAO Schwarz CEO (understandable since the piece is about him), and Otto, stuffed monkey. What? Do you see what's happening? The damn monkey is trying to muscle in on my big moment! Not satisfied with tattooing his name on his plush, squeezable foot, Otto wrangled the inclusion of his own, separate picture into the story and an actual boldface credit in the caption. What a publicity whore!

Next thing we know, Otto will be flashing his junk to the paparazzi as he drunkenly steps out of a zippy little Beemer driven by Wilmer Valderrama.

So I must be vigilant and watchful. The cheap, white cotton gloves are coming off. I will fight for the publicity that is rightfully mine. No longer will I simply be known as "toy soldier"! No longer will I be relegated to a two-second video clip playing as part of a background loop during an FAO piece on CNBC! No longer will the picture I pose for with American Idol judge Randy Jackson and family never run in the NY Post like the photographer said it would! And, most importantly, no longer will Otto undermine my ascent to the top! Brace yourself, readers. Tonight the downy-soft stuffing of one hundred Ottos will cover the floor of FAO's flagship store, and one hundred Otto-emblazoned feet will rest on the keys of that famous piano, never again to dance to upbeat renditions of "Chopsticks" and "Heart and Soul." Tonight, Otto, you have become Public Enemy #1!

PUBLIC ENEMY #1

(And so what if this post is focused overtly on myself, exactly what I promised you last time it wouldn't be. If you want to read a blog that's not in some manner about me, write your own, and I won't read that. Oh, by the way, I was never a Girl Scout. Ha!)

Non-fortune fortunes are ushering in the end times.

When the sesame chicken is finished and all that is left in the Styrofoam® container are those superfluous hunks of broccoli that no short-order cook actually intended for you to eat, the inevitable moment of closure awaits. Yes, fortune cookies aren't very tasty. And no, they're not native to China. But even if you don't eat the cookie - an innovative blending of stale and bland - you must crack it open to discover what the future holds...in bed. That said, nothing irritates me more (gross hyperbole) than finding out that my fortune is not a fortune at all but some ridiculous platitude or nonsensical sentence fragment. "A smile is like the flower in the midst of rocky soil." "Money is nice to have when you need it." "Love is good. Have fun day." I want to know if great financial success awaits me, if an old flame will re-enter my life (assuming I had old flames), or if I should be wary of street vendors who conspire to bring about my death. Non-fortune fortunes are just as awful as the edible packages in which they arrive. I want to shoot the message, the messenger, the minimum-wage worker folding the cookie around the little slip, the devil soul who generated the fortune-less muck, and your mother.

However, today at the Cuban-Chinese restaurant on E 60th God presented me with the first non-fortune fortune that I actually enjoyed:
What a wonderful read - a little disconcerting and a nice twist in the humdrum, everyday, slow shuffle off to death. Plus, it's bookended with smiley faces! But what secret is not-so-secret? Do all of you already know how self-conscious I am of what I've been able to retain from my graduate studies and how I fear someone asking me to elaborate on any number of philosophers? Don't tell me you're privy to the inexplicable sensation I have while standing in the shower and I see myself as a figure in a Peter Paul Rubens painting, composed of fleshy masses, rolling muscles, proportions heavy and protruding - and relish it. Maybe you've long suspected that I delete the emails I receive from Amnesty International without reading them. Or you find pleasure in the sad fact that I really can't do much more than the basics on my brand-new, pretty expensive, wondrously beautiful iMac. Oh, and I'd be more than a little embarrassed if you've been talking amongst yourselves for a while now about how, had the opportunity presented itself, I would've made out with a few undergrad and grad professors just to be exempted from the final paper assignment. (Don't worry, Adam. This doesn't include you. You never gave long writing assignments anyway.)

Now this next part is dangerous and possibly masochistic. I'm asking you, dear readers, to drop off your own suggestion. Don't be afraid/timid/obvious. We're all adults here - excluding for now the substantial number of hits I receive from tweens (2BZ4UQT! LOL). If you have an idea, hand it over. Remember, I can always delete, so you're not being given as much power as you may think. And I promise that the next post will not be focused so overtly on myself, and I will not ask you to spend any more precious time thinking about me than you're already liable to do. Girl Scouts' pinky swear. Honest.

P.S. My lucky lotto numbers are: 40 49 42 47 29 44.

Readers' comments are ushering in the end times.

Dear readers,

You are glorious, often lithesome, and most definitely, when a conscious effort is made, cut an imposing figure. Thank you so much for your contribution thus far. Of course it's all worthless - a sad, shrugging-of-shoulders acceptance of the inevitable. An avoidance of the real question at hand. What can be done to maintain the tenuous harmony of the earth? Will it help if I choose paper instead of plastic? Should I save the seal pups or club them to death? Must I fashionably convert to something fashionable or remain refreshingly true to my down-home roots? Regarding this dilemma, for advice apt and true, still I wait.

To address the misguided but treasured comments deposited here after my last post:

Ashley,
I haven’t reenacted anything from Big. I have danced in the hip-hop style to current radio hits while working a lavish in-store bar mitzvah…outfitted in my toy soldier uniform. So, sadly, there is far too much video of me “dropping it like it’s hot” when it was actually very, very hot inside the woolen costume and furry “bearskin cap.” Without a doubt this will resurface to bite me in the ass, perhaps as early as later on today.

Paula,
Your commitment to my immortalization is endearing. However, it doesn’t compare to the brick by brick, floorboard by floorboard reproduction of the auditorium at Dalhart Junior High School undertaken by my mother to commemorate my stint as MC for a very special 8th grade voice recital, during which I sang Streisand’s “People” and “Memory” from Andrew Lloyd Webber’s much-loved, much-maligned Cats.

Michael,
Please don’t leave any comments on my blog regarding panty-shots. They may shrug at your vulgarity down in Tennessee, but here in NYC we still care a thing or two about genteelness and decency.

Adam,
A very sagacious warning addressing overexposure, albeit a belated one. If only I could have received these words two years ago. That said, the swimsuit issue of Focus on the Family magazine is my favorite. Where else can you find Joyce Meyers, Anne Graham Lotz, and Rick Warren grace the glossy pages in tasteful, Christian-appropriate bathing suits that are not only comfortable and flattering but also do not lead to covetousness because the line and cut of the garment encourage the glorification of the Heavenly Father? Also, a reliable highlight in this annual issue is the unveiling of Ted Haggard’s always-enjoyable line of swimwear and intimate apparel for men.

And remember, a d.a.vid a day keeps the doctor at bay. (If that’s true, then I guess it’s up to me to provide a d.a.vid a day. Is it too early in my career to justify the services of a ghostwriter?)

The Church of Celebrity Worship is ushering in the end times.

Since I'm on the subject of celebrity, specifically my own, I think it's imperative that my substantial readership and I together must address the cataclysmic effect my impending celebrity will have on the world. And I'm talking about actual celebrity, not some half-assed, specious claim which attempts to link celebrity with the likes of a frequently photographed toy store employee reeking of anonymity. (Loser.) This will be a full-blown, Us Weekly, In Touch, Life & Style, grocery store check-out line saturated celebrity apocalypse.

Now, don't misunderstand me. I am not actively pursuing fame and notoriety. However, this albatross duo has been giving me backaches for some time. In late junior high and early high school, I was so influenced by the premonition of my inevitable celebrity that I saved absolutely everything that had my signature on it, that had been in my possession for any period of time at all, that could in any conceivable manner be associated with my person, so eventually this paraphernalia could be gathered with ease for future retrospectives, archival projects, and auctions with Sotheby's. I never made extensive notations in books I was reading for fear of what later generations of Speerians (Speervians? Speerites? Speerophiles?) would uncover in their exhaustive searches of my personal memorabilia. Would they consider my remarks dashed out in the margins of One Hundred Years of Solitude shallow and ill-founded? Would they successfully conjecture that I had no idea whatsoever how to read Shakespeare in the 10th grade? Even in undergrad I still experienced the hanging-ons of such a mindset. Example: In quick notes to myself on Post-its regarding menial tasks for the day I would follow a questionably spelled word with an obligatory (sp?) - just in case someone happened to look at my grocery list. They must be aware that I was aware that this particular word had been troublesome. (unrelated: Why do I hear a rooster crowing in Brooklyn?)

Our world is oversaturated with celebrity in general. Any actor/director/celebutante/spokesmodel/dj can't pick a wedgie at three in the morning without the world reading about two hours earlier. The tabloids have gotten that good. Do we really want to know what baby food they give to their one-year-old in vitro twins, where they buy their favorite bottled water, or how they learned to love again after they thought they'd never love again (for the fourth or fifth time)? Judging by the never-ending addition of celeb-glut magazines, apparently so.

This has me troubled. I can't bear the thought of carelessly heaping my celebrity onto the already stinking pile of decaying oversized sunglasses, Botox appointments, product endorsements, jilted lovers, adopted babies, Vanity Fair confessions, and nipple slips. It would be irresponsible of me to show such utter disregard for the well-being of Mother Earth and her children of all shapes, sizes, and gender reassignments. Think about this: DC-based American Forests has a Climate Change Calculator which allows you to determine how many trees you must plant to offset the fossil fuel-generated CO2 you produce through daily activity - heating, electricity, emissions. In a similar manner, what can we do to counterbalance the consequence of my unavoidable celebrity? This, like saving America’s forests, is a serious issue to be given due consideration. Perhaps a panel of international experts, including of course an actual Goodwill Celebrity or two, could convene at the UN to address this pandemic. I am not one to spit in the wind, bite the hand that feeds me, or shit in the bled I sleep. I desire to be a responsible human/actor/celebrity/demigod, and I am starting with you, dear readers. I am searching your highly educated minds to uncover what can be done. Please leave comments with your suggestions. The children of Africa demand your diligence. Your post could save the world, so let's get busy planting figurative trees! Or literal! At this point I’m open to anything.

P.S. - If by chance my readership isn't as vast as I'm certain it is and the response turns out to be less than stellar, I will have to start posting suggestions of my own. I'm a busy man. Please do not force me to waste my time when you could be wasting your own.

My newfound celebrity is ushering in the end times.

In my position as a uniformed toy soldier. . . . . .


I really don't even need to finish that sentence. The impact has already been sufficiently felt by the reader. Like a sharp gust of wind against the face or the quick belch which hits the unsuspecting ear with the force of a percussive rimshot. Hell, I give an involuntary reaction to that introductory phrase, and I received warning about it a month ago.

The other day I was standing guard at the 58th Street entrance – waiving to passing cars, saluting contractors in their work vans and chauffeurs in black Lincoln Town Cars, dispensing goodwill in general – when a man and his family drove by in their SUV. The light turned red, so traffic stopped. He rolled down his window. I saluted, smiled, waived. He yelled, "You need to finish college!" I yelled back, "I have a master's degree!" "Then you're a goddamn fool!" And with that, our uplifting dialogue came to an end.

There are some things one doesn't set out to accomplish: memorizing every lyric to The Bodyguard soundtrack, watching VH1's marathon showing of an entire season of America's Next Top Model, buying a John Tesh album. I'm sure being employed as a "character" at any number of theme parks/tourist attractions must be included in this list. Does anyone aspire to don the cumbersome trappings of Donald Duck and wander around the sprawl of Disneyworld, suffering the whims, fetishes, and tantrums of young and old? Although I'd prefer not to stand outside of FAO Schwarz five or six days a week dressed like an English bobby - being told for the 500th time, "Hey! You're not supposed to move!" and responding for the 500th time, "Bitch, you don't know me! Where d'ya get off judging me!" - it's a necessary irritant. I mean, a job is a job, right? Whether you're a CEO or a plain ol' ho. And while I did not move to New York to be a subservient, though widely celebrated, doorman, the pay isn't awful, the hours are flexible, and the customers are for the most part great.

It's all a matter of choosing the tomorrow over today. I mean, I'm always willing to endure the temporary hassle of post-surgery bandages if I'm promised a stunning new nose or set of cheekbones. Good things come to those who wait. Or sometimes they don't, and you just have sadness.

But an amusing aspect of this job and the supposed subject of this post is my status as one of the most photographed people in New York City. Honest. I am something of a minor celebrity, albeit a nameless figure isolated from any individual identity apart from my association with said employer. But nevertheless, a type of celebrity - an unlikely species in the celebrity genus. I appear in memory cards and photo albums across Europe, Asia, Australia, Central and Latin America, and the contiguous United States. Do people actually compile photo albums in the Year of Our Lord Two-Thousand and Six? On average I will have my picture taken 50 to 100 times a day. If it's busy, closer to 200. And we haven't even entered into the holiday season. I hold babies, hug wives (and probably mistresses), pose with countless Flat Stanleys. I salute (right- and left-handed), smile, stiffen, look very stern. I stand next to the genuinely excited, the mocking, the ironic, the unwilling, the crying. Soon I will start popping up in strangers' Christmas cards. A co-worker informed me that I could also make unwished-for showings on the internet with other people's naughty bits superimposed. But this individual is a something of a self-hating drama queen and cannot be relied upon too heavily.

Regardless, here I am being paid to give the appearance of history, to hijack another country’s tradition for profit. But the tourists love it. They, who have actual soldiers guarding actual monarchy in actual castles, will wait their turn to have they’re picture taken with me – a fake soldier in America’s castle, the department store, guarding nothing. In it’s extreme, Europe has Paris; America has Paris Las Vegas with a half scale replica of the Eiffel Tower. But to be fair, we bastardize our own history and landmarks just as frequently (New York-New York Hotel and Casino; the instant nostalgia of any “neighborhood” Applebee’s). It’s this exciting combination of self-consciousness over our own relatively short history and collective greed that has created my current job. So, if being greedy is the American way, at least my enlistment in, what a friend has coined, the Sugar Queen's standing army allows me to be cheerful about the whole mess.

Plus, I get to hear all day long how good I look in uniform.

Balls are ushering in the end times.

I think this photograph of mine says it all. Why do we still let our children and wives play with them?

AFA is ushering in the end times.

So, it's no surprise that AFA (American Family Association) is helping to ring in the Apocalypse. What's surprising is how effectively they've gotten under my skin. In high school, AFR (American Family.....Radio) was in my home everyday, and I listened to the more-often-than-not clunky Christian pop, the earnest Christian hosts, and an occasional, awkward message from AFA's founder, Don Wildmon. Think of Pat Robertson's halting delivery on his 700 Club, and you've got the picture: co-hosts trying to smooth over the incoherent statements that are only tolerated because he founded the damn organization. AFA likes to raise a stink and bombard companies and television networks with emails from its members. "Boycott Disney!" "Boycott Ford!" "We saw Janet's nipple! FCC, you better fine CBS and give it some good ass whuppins!" Etc. They protested the unedited airing of Saving Private Ryan and Schindler's List. They care, but they're really angry. Or they're angry but really care. Whatever. When I came across news about those little rascals' newest complaint drive, the pudgy passionate artist man who lives inside my kidney became riled up, and I stood on my chair and loudly said, "O Captain! My Captain!" Or something in a similar vein.

Here's the lowdown:

CBS is re-airing an Emmy and Peabody Award-winning 9/11 documentary, simply called 9/11. The documentary has already aired twice since 2002. The difference this time is that it is running without any commercial interruption or sponsor underwriting. The airtime which has been freed is being filled with additional interviews. For this broadcast the interviews will not be edited, and the language of the rescue workers will be heard in its frank delivery. CBS could experience some backlash because AFA views this as a direct affront to the recently increased FCC indecency fines. Here is an excerpt from AFA's website (The boldface is the site's own.):

"9/11," which will be shown in prime-time, contains a tremendous amount of hardcore profanity. CBS has stated they have not, and will not, make any cuts in the amount and degree of profanity. CBS will ignore the law. The network is suing the FCC over the indecency law, saying they should be able to show whatever they desire whenever they desire. CBS wants no limits.

Apparently, trying to air the actual words of emergency workers who were present at Ground Zero is the same as letting an f-bomb dropping Snoop Dog grope a gaggle of intoxicated, topless Spring Break coeds. Let's be honest: CBS wants no limits. (That boldface is my own. Thank you very much.)

What frustrates me is that an organization like AFA is incapable of seeing anything beyond the Big 3: Sex, Violence, and Profanity. It stamps television shows with a Good TV/Bad TV label in its AFA Journal solely under the guidelines of how frequently profanity is used or if the message and content fall under the vague umbrella of "family friendly." What the AFA doesn't understand is that art and any message it conveys cannot solely be judged by content which may be deemed objectionable. (And I'm making no claims that all television shows qualify as "art." Are you listening, Laguna Beach: Season Three?) A "profane" piece of art may in reality be frighteningly profound, and a viewer-safe program may be exceedingly inconsequential. Or vice versa. AFA itself applied this standard of reasoning when endorsing The Passion of the Christ, honestly one of the most excruciatingly violent movies in recent memory (Again, the boldface is theirs, not mine):

AFA has officially endorsed the movie The Passion of the Christ by Mel Gibson. We are urging everyone to see what Dr. James Dobson of Focus on the Family called a "film that must be seen." [...] We encourage to you to order enough tickets for your Sunday School class or small group. We especially encourage your church to provide a ticket for every youth in your church.

Oddly enough, AFA felt that the message of the movie trumped its objectionable content and specifically encouraged younger viewers to attend. In turn, I am following the precedent set by AFA. I believe that the historical importance and relevance of the documentary trumps any objection to the language used by the rescue workers in the film.

I know that realistically I cannot counter the millions of AFA devotees who will send en masse the letter of complaint to the FCC and CBS, but I'm taking something of a symbolic stand (Oh, how dramatic!). I used the petition that AFA has provided, erased the pre-filled body of the letter, and wrote my own in support of CBS's move to air the documentary. If you would like to follow suit, click here. If you use this link, an email will be sent to both the FCC and CBS. I do not know if AFA monitors the petitions which come from its website. If you've been really motivated (way to go, d.a.vid), perhaps you'll want to contact FCC and CBS directly.

Here is my exceptionally well-crafted letter:

Dear FCC,

I encourage you to responsibly review CBS's decision to air the 9/11 documentary in its unedited content. I have not seen the original edited form but will be watching when the documentary re-airs. The language may be hard, but the event itself was hard. These are the lives of the everyday men and women who experienced this tragedy as either victim or rescue worker. It is unnecessary to place fines against the CBS network for letting these individuals bring the truth of their experience to the American people. Appropriate parental advisories are sufficient to warn the viewing audience of the program's content. The censorship of the language of the rescue workers does nothing more than deny the humanity of the individuals who were present. It is not discouraging to discover that heroes are human too - quite the opposite. To understand that these were simply regular people, with the characteristics and shortcomings we all share, who were risking their lives to save others, is quite encouraging and awe-inspiring. It is the honest search into and assessment of our humanity that allows us to endure - to face the past, to understand the present, and to move forward into the future.

Thank you,
______ _______

(Now let me include a disclaimer: I have not seen the unedited or edited versions of the documentary. I imagine that the images and language included will be horrific, but that is not surprising considering the nature of the event.)

Couldn't AFA be using its 3,067,061 members (as of September 1) to be promoting other causes: Bible literacy; good ol' fashioned literacy; eradicating poverty or, perhaps, hunger; spreading kindness; giving hugs; calling their mothers; learning more complicated double dutch variations? When did they hijack the terms "decency" and "family" and make them so irrational? Having standards is not the same as being stupid.

Blogging is ushering in the end times.

I was eating a bowl of Kashi brand Good Friends cereal this morning, enjoying those little flakes that are strangely similar in appearance to Sun Chips, and my sunny breakfast was ruined when I began to think about the state of the world, specifically the ruin brought on by bloggers. Who are these people? Where did they come from? And when will they leave?

A few things can be certain about these particular internet terrorists: they were teenage journalers, given to meandering entries of loss, love, loss of love, and swirly sketches of hearts being consumed by the Death Dragon, Jack, which sent the young soul into a goth-lite state of self-indulgent sorrow long enough to spend their entire paycheck from the snow-cone stand on clothes and accessories at Hot Topic. They deem their mundane everyday to be significant enough to be set apart from the mundane everyday of the masses and be read by these said masses who will quickly assimilate it into their own mundane everyday. Nice. Most likely they're narcissistic and feel smug satisfaction when dispensing unasked-for advice. They'll probably tell you what they had for breakfast and the exact thing that was going through their mind as they took another spoonful of Kashi brand Good Friends cereal. And if we're lucky they'll also have a myspace site from which we can discover which Saved by the Bell character they are most like and whether or not they're alcoholics. The titles of their blogs are clumsy attempts to be humorous or, God forbid, witty and often make no sense whatsoever. And just like the user pictures found on myspace, the unattractive bloggers obscure their faces behind wicker nightstands and strategically placed cameras to prevent the viewer from seeing the truth of the matter. It's pure smoke and mirrors. Even the word itself is ugly - blog. Klingon with a touch of sinus infection.

But perhaps the most pressing question is, "Why do we indulge these vain terrorists and actually read the rubbish they spit out?" Because, when all is said and done and the fat lady is crying over her spilled eggs which were counted before they hatched, we all want to be bloggers too. We want more people than our mothers to care about what's running around in our tiny heads. We want to show off our ironic detachment and the casual manner with which we traverse between high and low culture as we toss off pithy comments and seduce a susceptible audience with our unique and humorous perspective. I am unique, right? We want to dazzle you with our postmodern dance moves, aware that you're aware that we're aware that you're aware. And we want to tie things up with a nice closing paragraph which is both cynical and a little wistful.

Oh, and we all want to be famous.